POSH Act Implications on Online Taxi Services
Facts:
The petitioner had availed a taxi using an app-based platform to commute to her office. During her commute, the petitioner was subjected to sexual harassment by the driver of the taxi. Further, the driver refused to stop the taxi in spite of repeated requests from the petitioner to do so.
In response to this, the petitioner filed a criminal complaint against the driver. This was followed up with a legal notice issued to the app-based platform directing its Internal Complaints Committee to initiate an investigation into her complaint. However, in response to this, the taxi platform stated that its ICC did not have the power to take up the petitioner's complaint under the POSH Act. They argued that the drivers were not “employees” but were “independent contractors.”
Unsatisfied with the platform’s response, the petitioner approached the state High Court for relief on this matter.
Issue:
Does POSH redressal apply to Independent Contractors of companies?
Summary of Decision:
The court confirmed that an employer-employee relationship did in fact exist between the taxi app and its driver subscribers. Further, it directed the ICC to conduct an enquiry into the petitioner’s complaint in accordance with the POSH Act along with stipulations to cover the victim’s compensation and litigation expenses.